Skip to main content

Thoughts on "Transgender History"

 


(Note: I use the term "trans people" for trans people in general, though noteworthy to mention, this post mostly discussed trans women, and "transsexual" to describe specifically the group historically described as such, that pursued medical intervention of hormone therapy and surgeries in an attempt to fully transition to the other gender)

I found myself very much enjoying this short history. And also found, to my (it seems vain) surprise how little sophistication my previous knowledge about the history of trans people and LGBT people in general involved. I must note that this book perhaps should be better termed "American Transgender History" since it focuses on the United States almost exclusively (except a short section in the beginning about Magnus Hirschfeld and the Institut fuer Sexualwissenschaft, even this is later "revealed" to be included because of the impact it had on Harry Benjamin, an acquaintance of Hirschfeld's) - while it alludes to different developments in Europe (that seems to have been substantially more progressive than the USA, enabling HRT and SRS already at the 50s, while in the USA these only became truly available in the later 60s). But still - the USA has come to be supremely influential on queer cultures worldwide and therefore even this partial narrative is still very much valuable to me, although I am not an American myself.

The narrative focuses on trans people as a social phenomenon, and places the origin of both trans women and gay male communities (until the 1970s they were broadly seen as facets of a single community of Homosexuals/Effeminate Men) in the middle of the 19th Century with the process of urbanization. It allowed for people greater anonymity (which wasn't afforded in the traditional rural communities) and also greater contact with a more varied group of people, giving birth to early queer urban communities. These were further expanded by the advent of electric light that enabled a "nightlife" in addition to a "daylife".

As I mentioned prior (and also in my blog post about "Funeral Parade of Roses"), initially the categorization was more vague than it is nowadays, especially before the widespread use of HRT and gender-affirming surgeries, which made it initially more difficult to make distinctions between effeminate men and trans women. Also between "transvestites"/crossdressers and transsexuals. Some set up boundaries to protect their privileges from the beginning - noteworthily middle-class "respectable", white transvestites that usually met in secret and kept their male, heterosexual (that is, in this case, attracted to women) privileges that separated themselves from the transsexuals, which were seen as types of homosexuals instead, and were much more commonly poor, and lived primarily in multiracial groups and frequently, out of an inability to find other work, had to resort to sex work.

When Christine Jorgensen, perhaps the first truly famous transsexual, at least in the USA, entered the limelight, public attitude tended to be more about fascination with the wonders of science than later popular attitudes that became more characterized by hostility towards trans people than fascination.

In the USA, a major turning point was the publication of Harry Benjamin's "The Transsexual Phenomenon" that first advocated affirming the gender identity of transsexuals rather than try, in vain, to "fix them" which evidentially was impossible anyway. This resulted in increased access to healthcare and more attention from the medical establishment.

Around 1970 was the split between the gay and trans identities. As gay advocacy groups achieved victories, such as the depathologization of homosexuality and its removal from the DSM and focused on such efforts (as well as increasing cultural conformity to traditional masculine attire and behavior, compared with earlier years), they were contrasted with trans people's advocacy which involved access to hormone therapy and surgeries, and that therefore also enabled the medical establishment and psychiatry further influence in this regard and in fact, in contrast with homosexuals, increased the pathologization of trans people. This led to a clear and sharp distinction between these now separate groups of people.

As for trans men (I've discussed in this blog post trans women pretty much exclusively), the reason for less information about them is because they came to constitute their own communities only much later. That is because they tended to blend in, for example, as butches in the lesbian community or, when HRT became available, used to more easily blend even with cishet society. FTM specific groups however did eventually emerge, especially as second-wave radical feminism pushed against the rights of trans people, trans men that frequently found place in the lesbian community as masculine females were driven out and formed their own groups from just around that time, around the year 1970.

Anyway, in addition to this summary of a sort I just did I want to also express how reading about the history of this group I am a part of instilled pride within me, as well as, somehow, greater optimism in regards to my own transition. It's a short book yet hosts such wonderful narratives and I'd highly recommend this to anyone even remotely interested in the topic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on "After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory"

  After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory by Alasdair MacIntyre I'll start by saying I found this book truly valuable and illuminating. I'll divide my observations about it to two sections, the first about its criticisms of dominant ethical stances as well as the social sciences. The second about the solution it proposes, its version of virtue ethics. In the beginning of the book MacIntyre essentially compares the state of ethics in modern society to the premise of A Canticle for Leibowitz. The idea is that there was a catastrophic cataclysm of a sort that rendered ideas that were once intelligible, comprehensible, logical null. A weird state like the premise of A Canticle for Leibowitz ( which I wrote a blog post on ), in which we possess fragments of knowledge about the past, but we are also in a state of semiotic confusion about the meaning of the terms and why they are there in the first place (like how a scholar in the aforementioned novel believed Capek's R.U.R is in f

Thoughts on "A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years"

  A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch "A History of Christianity" is a massive historical overview. A thousand pages depicting the long history of Christianity from its cultural roots in ancient Judaism and classical civilizations all the way to our day and age. For this reason whatever thoughts I can compose here cannot summarize it, the vast multitude of subjects and ideas would render that task futile. Rather, I'll discuss a couple of observations, ones I found among the most interesting and enlightening. One such observation that I found fascinating was the relationship between Christianity and earthly political power. Christianity's very conception of theological orthodoxy was molded by its partnership with Roman imperial authority, the Emperor present in ecumenical councils and subsequently lending his violent military power to the enforcement of the resulting conclusion of the council. When Julian attempted to under

Thoughts on "Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism"

  Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism by Gershom Scholem This book, while follows the history of a theme, namely, Jewish mysticism, it is in fact divided to lectures each focusing on a specific movement or writer. Therefore I'll instead comment on some of the theoretical foundations of this work. To begin with, Scholem conceptualizes religious belief as having historical stages. According to him, belief begins as direct and animistic - the natural world is conceived as living and natural phenomena as the manifestations of divine forces. In this stage, the relationship to that which is holy is direct, as it exists literally around us. The second stage according to him was the development of monotheism and "naive religion" which he seems to have a most favorable view - this religion has a fundamental gap between humans and the divine, and rules that must be followed. The third stage is the collapse of the naive religion as the believers search for hidden meanings behind the l