Skip to main content

Thoughts on "Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?"

 

Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? by Mark Fisher

"It is easier to imagine the end of the world than an end to capitalism." 
That's the key sentence that sums up, very broadly, the idea of what "capitalist realism" really is. If, at the past, certain political and economic orders needed to employ vast amounts of propaganda to justify themselves (Liberal Capitalism, too, did so quite until fairly recently, "The American Dream" and the like) nowadays Capitalism requires no such thing. Paradoxically, it employs a certain cynicism and anti-utopian sentiments to maintain its entrenchment. The reason it can do that is because, instead of competing for our sympathy, Capitalism, and in particular Neoliberal Capitalism (characterized by a totalizing market that pervades all spaces, including in the private sphere, or what Fisher himself termed "Business Ontology") simply occupies everything that the eye can see, stretching from one horizon to the other, nothing else remains visible. If during the 20th Century there was a visible alternative in the form of the East Bloc, nowadays none of that remains - the triumph of Capitalism cannot be overstated.

Due to this, a remarkable development has occurred. Even nominally anti-capitalist elements have now resorted, instead, to simply mitigate the negative effects of capitalism by advocating for what amounts de-facto to a mild social-democracy. Thus we can see the common occurrence, that without this context might appear surreal to an outside observer, of full-blown 'communists' supporting Bernie Sanders staunchly. A social-democratic politician that would have been regarded by the ultra-left politics of the 1920s as the worst enemy of communism now became the hero of the communists. Alternatively, we also see leftists that simply refuse to participate in politics and therefore place themselves in a state of total-irrelevancy.

In fact, this limitation to our very perception of reality, the total domination of capitalism over our epistemological horizons mean that apart from a broad statement of intent, there is no true difference anymore between the progressive liberal, social democrat and communist and anarchist - all these divisions are nothing but different brandings in our current condition of what amounts to left-leaning Liberalism. There were also additional effects that proved self-fulfilling. The left lost all real confidence in its ability to change anything that the same ideological arena responsible for countless revolutionary movements during the 20th Century have resorted to a condition of fantasizing about a revolution, but only in the broadest of terms, making it resemble more an idea of a religious end-times one has to wait for, rather than a very complex and momentous time period in which one is an active participant. For this reason, as the far-right labors substantially for the acquiring of more and more power by making connections in powerful institutions, infiltrate them, place their people in office and parliament, form militias, the radical left, now lacking the slightest of imagination, calls for a revolution on twitter (and guillotine memes) that it is entirely unprepared for and cannot possibly win.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on "Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties"

  Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties by Tom O'Neill " The evidence I’d amassed against the official version of the Manson murders was so voluminous, from so many angles, that it was overdetermined. I could poke a thousand holes in the story, but I couldn’t say what really happened. In fact, the major arms of my research were often in contradiction with one another. It couldn’t be the case that the truth involved a drug burn gone wrong, orgies with Hollywood elite, a counterinsurgency-trained CIA infiltrator in the Family, a series of unusually lax sheriff’s deputies and district attorneys and judges and parole officers, an FBI plot to smear leftists and Black Panthers, an effort to see if research on drugged mice applied to hippies, and LSD mind-control experiments tested in the field… could it? There was no way. " This quote from the final chapter of "Chaos" summarizes the results of the effort that was made to dispel the lies...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on "A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years"

  A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch "A History of Christianity" is a massive historical overview. A thousand pages depicting the long history of Christianity from its cultural roots in ancient Judaism and classical civilizations all the way to our day and age. For this reason whatever thoughts I can compose here cannot summarize it, the vast multitude of subjects and ideas would render that task futile. Rather, I'll discuss a couple of observations, ones I found among the most interesting and enlightening. One such observation that I found fascinating was the relationship between Christianity and earthly political power. Christianity's very conception of theological orthodoxy was molded by its partnership with Roman imperial authority, the Emperor present in ecumenical councils and subsequently lending his violent military power to the enforcement of the resulting conclusion of the council. When Julian attempted to under...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on "Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism"

  Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism by Gershom Scholem This book, while follows the history of a theme, namely, Jewish mysticism, it is in fact divided to lectures each focusing on a specific movement or writer. Therefore I'll instead comment on some of the theoretical foundations of this work. To begin with, Scholem conceptualizes religious belief as having historical stages. According to him, belief begins as direct and animistic - the natural world is conceived as living and natural phenomena as the manifestations of divine forces. In this stage, the relationship to that which is holy is direct, as it exists literally around us. The second stage according to him was the development of monotheism and "naive religion" which he seems to have a most favorable view - this religion has a fundamental gap between humans and the divine, and rules that must be followed. The third stage is the collapse of the naive religion as the believers search for hidden meanings behind the l...
Post a Comment
Read more