Doctor Faustus

  Transgender History by Susan Stryker (Note: I use the term "trans people" for trans people in general, though noteworthy to mention, this post mostly discussed trans women, and "transsexual" to describe specifically the group historically described as such, that pursued medical intervention of hormone therapy and surgeries in an attempt to fully transition to the other gender) I found myself very much enjoying this short history. And also found, to my (it seems vain) surprise how little sophistication my previous knowledge about the history of trans people and LGBT people in general involved. I must note that this book perhaps should be better termed "American Transgender History" since it focuses on the United States almost exclusively (except a short section in the beginning about Magnus Hirschfeld and the Institut fuer Sexualwissenschaft , even this is later "revealed" to be included because of the impact it had on Harry Benjamin , an acqua

  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism by Benedict Anderson In this book there is an attempt, one that I'd characterize as McLuhanist , to bring into intelligibility how material conditions brought about the consciousness of nationalism - inventing a form of membership that until recently did not exist and also made no sense. The root Anderson locates as, in his opinion, that most substantial is the advent of print. He observes the consequences of print and how it yielded a national consciousness. First he starts, in indeed a manner that I wouldn't be surprised to find written by McLuhan - by expressing a different attitude towards simultaneity that developed due to print culture. The mass produced books and newspapers allowed for a new consciousness in which many people, most of whom one isn't familiar with, all participate in reading the very same words, and in the exact same fashion as countless nameless others. This, Anderson believe

The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness  by R. D. Laing This work represents a criticism of psychiatry. It fundamentally questions some basic premises that psychiatry has about itself and its role, as well as the "mentally disordered". Laing starts the book first by examining different angles by which one can view a human being - a human being can be a person, and a human being can be an organism. Therefore - when a human being speaks, you can either look at the content of what they express, or you may look at it as a mechanical/biological process that manifests. According to Laing, one fundamental problem in psychiatry is that it's devoted to the latter (as a biological organism) even though the discipline itself is a study and therapy relating to personhood, something that on the surface at least does appear rather absurd. In this work he brings the example of " hebephrenic " and " catatonic " individuals to make his point - whic

  Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil At my previous post (about After Virtue ) I have concluded with the unnerving sensation of being lost - morality has been thoroughly undermined by MacIntyre's analysis and yet while I did find myself sympathetic or willing to give some credibility to the idea of Virtue Ethics I was still broadly left unconvinced by its totality, only conceding it could be useful in specific contexts. Thankfully, the very next book I've now finished, Gravity and Grace, brought to my attention an alternative path.  Considering the modest length of this book, it has taken me quite a while to finish since its ideas are compiled rather densely. Also, additionally, the amount of ideas present is overwhelming and therefore I'll only mention here a couple I found of most interest. In regards to the ethical question raised prior, Weil has compiled a wholly different way of thinking about goodness compared with more secular philosophy - goodness as a manifestation o

  After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory by Alasdair MacIntyre I'll start by saying I found this book truly valuable and illuminating. I'll divide my observations about it to two sections, the first about its criticisms of dominant ethical stances as well as the social sciences. The second about the solution it proposes, its version of virtue ethics. In the beginning of the book MacIntyre essentially compares the state of ethics in modern society to the premise of A Canticle for Leibowitz. The idea is that there was a catastrophic cataclysm of a sort that rendered ideas that were once intelligible, comprehensible, logical null. A weird state like the premise of A Canticle for Leibowitz ( which I wrote a blog post on ), in which we possess fragments of knowledge about the past, but we are also in a state of semiotic confusion about the meaning of the terms and why they are there in the first place (like how a scholar in the aforementioned novel believed Capek's R.U.R is in f

  A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch "A History of Christianity" is a massive historical overview. A thousand pages depicting the long history of Christianity from its cultural roots in ancient Judaism and classical civilizations all the way to our day and age. For this reason whatever thoughts I can compose here cannot summarize it, the vast multitude of subjects and ideas would render that task futile. Rather, I'll discuss a couple of observations, ones I found among the most interesting and enlightening. One such observation that I found fascinating was the relationship between Christianity and earthly political power. Christianity's very conception of theological orthodoxy was molded by its partnership with Roman imperial authority, the Emperor present in ecumenical councils and subsequently lending his violent military power to the enforcement of the resulting conclusion of the council. When Julian attempted to under

  Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties by Tom O'Neill " The evidence I’d amassed against the official version of the Manson murders was so voluminous, from so many angles, that it was overdetermined. I could poke a thousand holes in the story, but I couldn’t say what really happened. In fact, the major arms of my research were often in contradiction with one another. It couldn’t be the case that the truth involved a drug burn gone wrong, orgies with Hollywood elite, a counterinsurgency-trained CIA infiltrator in the Family, a series of unusually lax sheriff’s deputies and district attorneys and judges and parole officers, an FBI plot to smear leftists and Black Panthers, an effort to see if research on drugged mice applied to hippies, and LSD mind-control experiments tested in the field… could it? There was no way. " This quote from the final chapter of "Chaos" summarizes the results of the effort that was made to dispel the lies

  The Concept of the Political by Carl Schmitt I would like to divide my thoughts here to two categories. The first category - looking at Schmitt's critiques of Liberalism and even an aside to Marxism . The second category - an examination of Schmitt's own argument and conception of the political. One main observation that Schmitt lays down, in regards to the foundations upon which Liberalism stands upon, is that it ultimately has a mythical view of The State. Although seen as dispelling antiquated myths, in reality Liberalism has embraced a vision of The State that seems to find its origin in the old conception of divine mandate, as if the apparatus stands tall above, and dominates, the rest of the social forces. He demonstrates how that may be self-delusion by stating that as long as the state itself isn't a political entity, that is, one with a clear sense of goal predicated upon the friend/enemy distinction, it is more than anything a tool to be used by truly political